Accused Poker Cheat’s Defamation Suit Caves in Face of Anti-SLAPP Motion

The salamander player at the center of attention of the Stones Live John Cash Game cheating outrage has withdrawn a $330 billion defamation accommodate against his former accusers.

Last October, Mike Postle sensationally sued numerous high-profile figures within the poker community. They had publicly accused him of receiving info near his opponents’ hollow cards during live-streamed broadcasts.

These included well-known players the like Book of Daniel Negreanu, Doug Polk, and Joey Ingram. Also named was Veronica Brill, the former Stones employee who, inward September 2019, first sonant her suspicions near Postle’s unbelievable winning run at Stones, a Sacramento-area scorecard room.

SLAPP-Happy

But Postle quiet asked the compositor's case to follow dismissed utmost week. This after Brill and another defendant, poker game participant and possessor of the PokerFraudAlert forums, Sir Alexander Robertus Todd Witteles, filed anti-SLAPP motions against Postle.

A SLAPP, or Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, is a vitrine which the plaintiff does not necessarily await to win. Instead, they are litigating inwards a bidding to silence, intimidate, or censor their critics.

Around the time these motions were filed, Postle’s lawyer, Steven T. Lowe, asked to live dismissed from the case.

Postle is a low-stakes grinder of intermediate power who began to demolish the hard currency games on the Stones Live Poker eat with such unerring technique that Brill – an occasional player in the games and reviewer on the programme – began to actualise something was non right.

Internet sleuths pored over hours of footage online, analyzing hands, and discussing the statistical implausibility of Postle’s sudden godlike win rates.

They concluded he was working with an confederate who had memory access to the backend of the radiocommunication frequency identification (RFID) scheme that show players’ cards for broadcast purposes.

Postle Stats ‘Unfathomable’

The caseful was exercise set out inward a civic lawsuit that alleged information was relayed to Postle via his cell phone, which he peeked at habitually below the tabulate during hands.

The fit was brought past almost 90 players who believed they had been defrauded inwards the games past Postle. It noted he declined to caper inward any other game other than the Stones Live John Cash Game. Meanwhile, his occult stove poker prowess appeared to bilk him during the occasional session when his suspected confederate happened to be out of town.

The rest of the time, analytic thinking of his play revealed “statistics non only if unfathomable inwards the humanity of professional person poker, but, too, situation decision-making inward which almost every so-called guessing to be made by Mr. Postle is done so inward a mode that optimally benefits his pecuniary interest.”

Postle is believed to have won around $250,000 in less than a twelvemonth playing $1/$3 and $5/$5 stakes.

The claims against Postle were dismissed inward June 2020, mostly on a technicality. According to a quirky nineteenth century statute, gambling disputes are “not cognizable below Golden State law, because California public policy bars juridical interference inward gaming disputes, inward constituent because the asserted damages are inherently speculative.”

Postle’s determination to later sue his accusers was met with disbelief in the salamander world.

This news is generated to you by the 918Kiss Singapore.